It must be noted that elements of meaning representation such as aspect, attitude, modality, temporal-relations, and so on are not encoded as concepts in the ontology. While it is certainly not difficult to build a separate ``TMR-concepts'' tree (say, under REPRESENTATIONAL-OBJECTs), this has not been done since it serves no practical purpose. The above elements of meaning are directly encoded in the lexicon and the analyzer does not derive any ontological constraints or disambiguation preferences for them. As such, they have not been added to the ontology. The reader should not expect every symbol that will enter into a meaning representation to be a concept (or known literal) in the ontology. The lexicon and the analyzer have the freedom to introduce elements of meaning such as attitudes and use them to modify ontological concepts.
Kavi Mahesh