1. Introduction to Ontological Semantics
1.1 A Model of Language Communication Situation for Ontological Semantic Theory 152. Prolegomena to the Philosophy of Linguistics1.1.1 Relevant Components of an Intelligent Agent’s Model 151.2 Ontological Semantics: An Initial Sketch 17
1.1.2 Goals and Operation of the Discourse Producer 16
1.1.3 Operation of the Discourse Consumer 16
1.3 Ontological Semantics and Non-Semantic NLP Processors 19
1.4 Architectures for Comprehensive NLP Applications 201.4.1 The Stratified Model 211.5 The Major Dynamic Knowledge Sources in Ontological Semantics 26
1.4.2 The “Flat” Model 22
1.4.3 Toward Constraint Satisfaction Architectures 221.5.1 The Analyzer 261.6 The Static Knowledge Sources 28
1.5.2 The Generator 27
1.5.3 World Knowledge Maintenance and Reasoning Module 27
1.7 The Concept of Microtheories 29
2.1 Reasons for Philosophizing 323. Ontological Semantics and the Study of Meaning in Linguistics, Philosophy and Computational Linguistics2.2 Reasons for Theorizing 342.3 Components of a Theory 39
2.2.1 Introduction: Philosophy, Science, and Engineering 34
2.2.2 Reason One: Optimization 36
2.2.3 Reason Two: Challenging Conventional Wisdom 37
2.2.4 Reason Three: Standardization and Evaluation 38
2.2.5 Reason Four: Explanation 39
2.2.6 Reason Five: Reusability 392.3.1 Purview 412.4 Parameters of Linguistic Semantic Theories 46
2.3.2 Premises 41
2.3.3 Body 43
2.3.4 Justification 442.4.1 Parameters Related to Theory Proper 472.4.2 Parameters Related to the Methodology Associated with a Theory 53
2.4.1.1 Adequacy 47
2.4.1.2 Effectiveness 48
2.4.1.3 Explicitness 50
2.4.1.4 Formality and Formalism 51
2.4.1.5 Ambiguity 532.4.2.1 Methodology and Linguistic Theory 532.4.3 Parameters Related to the Status of Theory as Model of Human Behavior 59
2.4.2.2 Methodology and AI 55
2.4.2.3 Methodology and the Philosophy of Science 55
2.4.2.4 Methodology of Discovery: Heuristics 55
2.4.2.5 Practical Skills and Tools as Part of Methodology 57
2.4.2.6 Disequilibrium Between Theory and Methodology 58
2.4.2.7 Specific Methodology-Related Parameters 59
2.4.4 Parameters Related to the Internal Organization of a Theory 59
2.4.5 Parameter Values and Some Theories 60
2.5 Relations Among Theory, Methodology and Applications 632.5.1 Theories and Applications 632.5.2 Blame Assignment 68
2.5.1.1 Difference 1: Goals 67
2.5.1.2 Difference 2: Attitude to Resources 68
2.5.1.3 Difference 3: Evaluation 68
2.5.3 Methodologies for Applications 692.5.3.1 “Purity” of Methodology 692.5.4 Aspects of Interactions Among Theories, Applications, and Methodologies 70
2.5.3.2 Solutions are a Must, Even for Unsolvable Problems 692.5.4.1 Explicit Theory Building 702.5.5 Examples of Interactions Among Theories, Applications, and Methodologies 72
2.5.4.2 Partial Interactions 70
2.5.4.3 Theoretical Premises Pertaining to Applications 71
2.5.4.4 Constraints on Automation 71
2.5.4.5 Real-Life Interactions 722.5.5.1 Statistics-Based Machine Translation 722.6 Using the Parameters 76
2.5.5.2 Quick Ramp-Up Machine Translation Developer System 73
2.6.1 Purview 77
2.6.2 Premises 782.6.2.1 Premise 1: Meaning Should Be Studied and Represented 782.6.3 Justification 81
2.6.2.2 Premise 2: The Need for Ontology 78
2.6.2.3 Premise 3: Machine Tractability 80
2.6.2.4 Premise 4: Qualified Compositionality 802.6.3.1 Why should meaning be studied and represented? 822.7 “Post-Empirical” Philosophy of Linguistics 83
2.6.3.2 Why is ontology needed? 82
2.6.3.3 Why should meaning be machine tractable? 83
2.6.3.4 Why should meaning be treated as both compositional and non-compositional? 83
3.1 Prehistory of semantics 864. Choices for Lexical Semantics
3.2 Diachrony of word meaning 86
3.3 Meaning and reference. 88
3.4 The Quest for Meaning Representation I: From Ogden and Richards to Bar-Hillel 893.4.1 Option 1: Refusing to Study Meaning 893.5 The Quest for Meaning Representation II: Contemporary Approaches 93
3.4.2 Option 2: Semantic Fields, or Avoiding Metalanguage 90
3.4.3 Option 3: Componential Analysis, or the Dawn of Metalanguage 903.4.4 Option 4: Logic, or Importing a Metalanguage 913.5.1 Formal Semantics 933.6 A Trio of Free-Standing Semantic Ideas from Outside Major Schools 100
3.5.2 Semantic vs. Syntactic Compositionality 97
3.5.3 Compositionality in Linguistic Semantics 98
3.7 Compositionality in Computational Semantics. 101
4.1 Generativity 1045. Formal Ontology and the Needs of Ontological Semantics4.1.1 Generative Lexicon: Main Idea 1044.2 Syntax vs. Semantics 109
4.1.2 Generative vs. Enumerative? 105
4.1.3 Generative Lexicon and Novel Senses 106
4.1.4 Permeative Usage? 107
4.1.5 Generative Vs. Enumerative “Yardage” 109
4.3 Lexical Semantics and Sentential Meaning. 1114.3.1 Formal Semantics for Sentential Meaning 1124.4 Description Coverage 115
4.3.2 Ontological Semantics for Sentential Meaning 112
4.3.3 Lexical Semantics and Pragmatics 114
5.1 Ontology and Metaphysics 1206. Meaning Representation in Ontological Semantics
5.2 Formal Ontology 1225.2.1 Formal Basis of Ontology 1225.3 Ontology and Natural Language 127
5.2.2 Ontology as Engineering 124
5.2.3 Ontology Interchange 1255.3.1 A Quick and Dirty Distinction Between Ontology and Natural Language 1275.4 A Wish List for Formal Ontology from Ontological Semantics 133
5.3.2 The Real Distinction Between Ontology and Natural Language 129
6.1 Meaning Proper and the Rest 1367. The Static Knowledge Sources: Ontology, Fact Database and Lexicons
6.2 TMR in Ontological Semantics 141
6.3 Ontological Concepts and Non-Ontological Parameters in TMR 148
6.4 The Nature and Format of TMR 149
6.5 Further Examples of TMR Specification 152
6.6 Synonymy and Paraphrases 155
6.7 Basic and Extended TMRs 156
7.1 The Ontology 1608. Basic Processing in Ontological Semantic Text Analysis7.1.1 The Format of Mikrokosmos Ontology 1637.2 Fact DB 191
7.1.2 Inheritance 172
7.1.3 Case Roles for Predicates 174
7.1.4 Choices and Trade-Offs in Ontological Representations. 180
7.1.5 Complex Events 182
7.1.6 Axiomatic definition of ontology. 187
7.3 The Lexicon 195
7.4 The Onomasticon 205
8.1 Preprocessing 2089. Acquisition of Static Knowledge Sources for Ontological Semantics8.1.1 Tokenization and Morphological Analysis 2088.2 Building Basic Semantic Dependency 212
8.1.2 Lexical Look-up 210
8.1.3 Syntactic Analysis 2118.2.1 Establishing Propositional Structure 2138.3 When Basic Procedure Returns More Than a Single Answer 221
8.2.2 Matching Selectional Restrictions 216
8.2.3 Multivalued Static Selectional Restrictions 2188.3.1 Dynamic Tightening of Selectional Restrictions 2218.4 When Basic Procedure Returns No Answer 231
8.3.2 When All Else Goes Wrong: Comparing Distances in Ontological Space 2288.4.1 Relaxation of Selectional Restrictions 2318.5 Processing Meaning Beyond Basic Semantic Dependencies 239
8.4.2 Processing Non-literal Language 231
8.4.3 Processing Unattested Inputs 235
8.4.4 Processing Ellipsis 2378.5.1 Aspect 2398.6 Processing at the Suprapropositional Level 254
8.5.2 Proposition Time 245
8.5.3 Modality 2488.6.1 Reference and Co-Reference 254
8.6.2 TMR Time 257
8.6.3 Discourse Relations 258
8.6.4 Style 260
9.1 Automating Knowledge Acquisition in Ontological Semantics 26110. Conclusion
9.2 Acquisition of Ontology 265
9.3 Acquisition of Lexicon 2739.3.1 General Principles of Lexical Semantic Acquisition 2739.4 Acquisition of Fact DB 298
9.3.2 Paradigmatic Approach to Semantic Acquisition I: “Rapid Propagation” 274
9.3.3 Paradigmatic Approach to Lexical Acquisition II: Lexical Rules 276
9.3.4 Steps in Lexical Acquisition 280
9.3.5 Polysemy Reduction 280
9.3.6 Grain Size and Practical Effability 287
9.3.7 Ontological Matching and Lexical Constraints 291